• Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Work With Me
  • Studio
  • Contact

Is McKenzie’s Derangement A Neurological Phenomenon?

Monday, 09 April 2012 16:46

Nervous systemDoes McKenzie’s derangement syndrome fit into a traditional patho-anatomical model? And if not, does it matter anyways?

With the derangement syndrome, we witness lasting changes in movement characteristics, strength, reflexes, and dural signs after the performance of directional preference movements. Mechanical and symptomatic responses to mechanical loading strategies, consistent with the operational definitions of McKenzie’s derangement syndrome, exist throughout the musculoskeletal system. The problem lies in providing a clear and consistent systemic or anatomical foundation to explain the phenomenon.

It is my proposal that the central nervous system may in fact provide the basis for McKenzie’s derangement syndrome, and may also provide yet another reason for MDT as a systems-based approach to musculoskeletal care.

Over the past 5 decades, a great deal of scientific research has been done on reflex inhibition. This is a neurophysiological feedback loop. One of the most common clinical scenarios is quadriceps reflex inhibition. A trauma or change in the movement characteristics of the knee (either by swelling, injury, or otherwise) elicits and/or disrupts afferent stimuli from nociceptors, proprioceptors, and mechanoreceptors. This afferent input travels to the central nervous system where it then contributes to an altered efferent output and impaired neuromuscular function of the quadriceps. We also know that neuronal plasticity exists in which the structure, function, and organization of neurons can be altered via this afferent input.

Reflex inhibition of the quadriceps will persist until the afferent stimuli are normalized.

This type of afferent-efferent feedback loop exists throughout the neuro-musculo-skeletal system. As computer scientists have noted, “Garbage In, Garbage Out”. Impaired afferent input (“garbage in”) will lead to impaired efferent output (“garbage out”).

The central nervous system will respond very readily to changes in afferent stimuli. Mechanical loading provides a significant influx of afferent stimuli. The tissues – muscular and nervous, connective and epithelial - will adapt to the imposed demands given an environment in which to do so over time.

Now, we have a rationale for the derangement syndrome and it’s treatment. Our lives are full of repeated movements and sustained postures. Can there be a disruption of afferent input to the central nervous system? Yes. This can occur in a variety of ways. Could this produce central sensitization over time? Absolutely.

The treatment goal then becomes one of normalizing afferent input to the central nervous system. Within the current paradigm, repeated movements and/or sustained postures – changes in mechanical loading – will normalize (or provide a barrage of normalized) afferent input to the central nervous system. This normalized afferent input would then immediately alter the potential for improved efferent output. Immediate lasting changes would be witnessed, including changes in strength and reflexes. These changes would occur far more rapidly than actual changes related to tissue repair and remodeling. If unresolved, or if impaired afferent input persists, the patient could then develop disuse atrophy, diminished EMG of various muscles, and tissue changes.

Take low back pain as an example. If the patient has a lumbar derangement, there is typically a directional preference. But what happens if the patient does not receive treatment addressing the directional preference? Impaired afferent input and reflex inhibition would persist. This inhibition could be reflected in decreased EMG function of the muscles that support the lumbar spine, along with long-term central sensitization. Neuromuscular inhibition could also explain why specific stabilization exercises have not proven to be any more effective in low back pain than other more general exercise programs. If there is a reflex inhibition present, all the strengthening in the world would not necessarily reduce it. This would be much like trying to strengthen the quadriceps without diminishing the reflex inhibition first.

A neurophysiological model would explain how any joint can derange without necessarily having some form of intra-articular pathology (i.e. meniscus, disc, etc). It also avoids the traditional use of a patho-anatomical, tissue-based model as such without altering the dynamics of the understanding of the behavior of the system itself (via repeated movements and sustained postures).

Neuromuscular inhibition (and facilitation) may in fact be the key to understanding McKenzie's derangement syndrome. With further research, we may find that McKenzie’s definition of derangement - “anatomical disruption or displacement within the motion segment” – may require adjustment. Perhaps we may find that the derangement is, more accurately, a “neurological disruption within the motion segment(s)”. But I digress.

To my knowledge, this is the first proposal of a neurologically-based foundation for McKenzie’s derangement syndrome that provides sound anatomical and physiological principles to explain the derangement (and the systems-based approach to care) for all regions of the musculoskeletal system.

Photo credits: pfly

Related articles
  • McKenzie's Derangement Syndrome In A World Of Pathoanatomy (allanbesselink.com)
  • Five Ways That MDT Will Change Orthopedics (allanbesselink.com)
  • Mechanical Diagnosis And Therapy: A Systems Approach To Musculoskeletal Injuries (allanbesselink.com)
  • McKenzie And Systemic Mechanical Diagnosis (allanbesselink.com)
alt

Subscribe To My Newsletter

I'll share my latest thoughts, ideas, blog posts, and content with you every two weeks! It's free and it's 100% spam-free. How cool is that? What more can you ask for?

Subscribe Now

Besselink Project

  • Smart Sport
  • Smart Physio
  • RunSmart
  • RiffSmart
  • P1 Project
  • Innovanated

BP Manifestos

  • Smart Health Revolution
  • Vision Now

Breaking News

  • Should Normal Have Ever Been Normal?
  • The Power Trio: Language, Context, And Intent
  • The Forks In The Road Of Life
  • Mechanical Loading: The Ultimate Diagnostic Tool?
  • Austin's Musical Golden Goose

Most Popular Posts

  • The Deafening Silence
  • Evolution Or Revolution?
  • Learning How To Live
  • Patient Access To Physical Therapy And Groundhog Day
  • The Homeostasis Of Writing
  • McKenzie’s Derangement Syndrome In A World Of Pathoanatomy
  • Three Common Examples Of Self Image, Self Sabotage, And Comfort Zones In Action
  • Why HB 1263 Matters
  • The Flow Of Running, The Flow Of Life
  • One Nation – Under Gold
  • A Pause For Many A Cause
  • Civil Rights And Your Health
  • Own, Disrupt, Transform–Or Else?
  • Is Non-Evidence-Based Clinical Practice An Ethical Dilemma?
  • The APTA’s Vision 2020: My 12 Year Report Card
  • Think Big, Act Big
  • The Paradox That Is World Cup Soccer
  • Generation Z And Obesity
  • Direct Access To Physical Therapy: You Have It, Or You Don’t
  • Your Own Worst Enemy

Allan Besselink

Allan Besselink, PT, DPT, Dip.MDTAllan Besselink, PT, DPT, Ph.D., Dip.MDT has a unique voice in the world of sport, education, and health care, one that has been defined by his experiences as physiotherapist, mentor, McKenzie practitioner, innovator, author, educator, coach, patient, and athlete. Read more about Allan, contact him, get updates via email, or connect with him on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn.

RunSmart Book

Where To Buy RunSmartUp to 60% of runners will sustain an injury within any given year. Poor running mechanics, in conjunction with poor, ineffective and outdated training methods, can pose a significant injury risk. "RunSmart" was written to address these issues in the running community.

Featured Chapter

Clinical Orthopaedic Rehabilitation "Running Injuries: Etiology And Recovery- Based Treatment" (co-author Bridget Clark, PT) appears in the third edition and fourth editions of "Clinical Orthopaedic Rehabilitation: A Team Approach" by Charles Giangarra, MD and Robert C. Manske, PT.

PT Blog Awards

Top 5 finalist in three categories: "Best Overall Blog", "Best PT Blog" and "Best Advocacy Blog".

Copyright 2006-2022 Allan Besselink  | Terms Of Use | Privacy Policy |  Disclosure Policy |  FAQ

Powered By Mobius Intermedia